Female supremacist pseudoscience is fast becoming more and more normalised online. Bombastic red pill bros who suggest that “men are better” are increasingly, and rightfully, shouted down; and yet those who routinely say the same for women, are often serenaded with finger-snapping “yes kween” applause. Some even pretend this superiority is baked into women’s genes, and that men’s “defective” Y chromosome only proves they are missing part of their humanity. I hear talk of a world run by women. Or one without men altogether. Whilst science fiction fantasies, where sperm are redundant, and women conceive without a man, are gleefully, and sinscerely passed around as if such a thing is now possible. Many quietly sip from their “The Future is Female” mug, totally unaware that such a phrase was largely popularised by a man-hating eugenicist Sally Miller Gearhart, who quite literally advocated to “reduce men to 10% of the human race”. That’s right. These sassy sentiments are widely accepted, encouraged even – but is there any merit to them? Are men defective women? Are XX chromosomes superior to the XY? And if men’s chromosomes really are flawed, might it be in a way that we’re not discussing? What do you think?

2026-10-06