For every step society makes toward recognising boys as legitimate, equally important victims of sexual violence, it’s only a matter of time before some grotesque Daily Mail slop, drags us back to the dark ages. And so here we are, once again, with the Mail reminding us why they are so roundly and rightly hated, with yet another guided tour of their moral bankruptsy and ineptitude. A filthy rag. A safe harbor to an army of parasitic writers; bottom feeders, dredged from the lowest levels of the gutter-press. No other paper could openly celebrate and glamorize a p*edophile, to the surprise of absolutely nobody. No other paper, would consider a ch*ld r*pist to be ‘glamourous’. But here we are… It sounds quite insane to write it myself, or to think anyone needs reminding – But an adult, male or female, cannot have ’s*x” with a child; such a thing can only be described as ‘r*pe’. And those who coerce, and groom children in such ways, are not ‘glamourous’, they are predators. More shocking still… It’s not just our tabloids that forget these lessons, but large parts of the public, and even the very judges who are presiding over the case themselves. So no – these boys are not ‘having an affair’, they are not ‘in a sexual relationship’, and they are certainly not ‘lucky’. They are children. And those in need of help. So let’s end the ‘lucky boy’ phenomenon, once and for all. What do you think? ~ ‘Lucky Boy!’; Public Perceptions of Child Sexual Offending Committed by Women https://tinyurl.com/2yrzxdku

2026-01-30