@thetinmen BREAKING NEWS: Are Bri Nh fathers about to lose their parental rights?
@thetinmen The UK Government are planning to scrap the legal 'Presumption of Parental Ministry of Justice involvement' Review of th Parental Invc Final Report as currently implemented within child custody cases_ * *not that family courts ever really worked like this
@thetinmen In simple terms; current UK child custody law; presumes that 'involvement from both parents is what's best for the child, e Presumption of lvement and starting from this presumption, both parents then build their case for custody, or make allegations in family court, until a final custody decision is made:
@thetinmen But this will soon be removed as feminist Children Act 1989 organisations CHAPTER 41 have campaigned " that this presumption PART I is dangerous to INTRODUCTORY Abolishedl mothers and children: Welfare of the child. (1) When a court determines any question with respect to the upbringing of a child; O the administration of child s property Or the applicat' _ on of any income arising from it; the child's welfare shall be the court'$ paramount consideration_ (2) In any proceedings in which any question with respect to the upbringing of a child arises, the court shall have regard to the general principle that any delay - 1n determining the question is likely to prejudice the welfare of the child [F(2A) A cout; in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (4)a) O is aS respects each parent within subsection (6)(a) to presume, unless the contrary is shown; that involvement of that parent in the life of the child concerned will further the childs welfare_ (2B) In subsection (2A) c involvement' means involvement of some kind, either direct O indirect; but not any particular division of a childs time:] In the circumstances mentioned in subsection (4),a court shallhave regard inparticular to
@thetinmen The move has been heralded as "groundbreaking" by family lawyers and campaigners who have long argued that the "pro-contact culture" in the family courts places the rights of abusive fathers over the safety and wellbeing of children ' The Guardian, Family law shift hailed as victory for children (..) The decision follows years of advocacy and research and acknowledges the devastating impact the presumption had on victims: the mothers and their children ' Shera Research Group, Campaigning researchers celebrate law (_.)
@thetinmen And let me be clear .. agree that if a child is abused by a parent, that parent should not be presumed legal rights, or custody of that child.
@thetinmen Campaign lead Campaign advisory board and partners However; if you look at who is behind the campaign, where it seems not a single man, or organisation representing fathers, or male victims advised, we really have to ask_ will this be applied fairly to both male and female abusers?
@thetinmen So let's take a look at the latest UK data on who perpetrates child abuse: Emotional Abuse Mothers: 45.5% Fathers: 40.6% Physical Abuse Mothers: 30.1% Fathers: 37.5% Sexual Abuse Mothers: 1.4% Fathers: 5.5% The vast majority of child sexual abuse is not perpetrated by either the child's mother or father:
@thetinmen (this guy nails it) 18h ago This new proposal to remove the legal presumption that contact with both parents is usually in a child's best interest might seem protective on the surface, but in practice it will open a very dangerous door: By eliminating the presumption of shared parental involvement, we are creating a system where one parent (often the more vindictive or manipulative one) can even more easily weaponize the courts to exclude the other parent; especially fathers, from their children's lives. Parental alienation and false allegations are already rising problems, and this change will make it even easier to destroy a loving parent's relationship with their child based on nothing more than suspicion or emotional revenge: The law as it stands already includes safeguards to restrict contact in cases of proven risk or abuse. Repealing the presumption entirely removes the already weak balance between protection and parental equality: It gives unchecked power to those willing to exploit the system,and once alienation takes hold; the psychological damage to children is lifelong: Laws should be written to protect all children; including those whose right to have two loving parents is being silently erased by false claims and manipulative court tactics. This is an incomplete and potentially dangerous reform: Instead of repealing the presumption; the government should strengthen risk assessment, psychological evaluation, and false-allegation accountability mechanisms, not dismantle the foundation of shared parenting altogether. This will just make family court even more one-sided:
@thetinmen What do children really need? What do you think? @thetinmen
KF This isn't Young men; Why are you giving about youl up on @thetinmen Filtaan Btlteahrnun hvpocritical ula Young ovoryAsinglo houl PATH PATREON Tre cying T NT F nctosefd a VRconroat Mefet ETAi G#tf Hecdlyttenin Aeeenteitt dtoth IS THIS THE SAME patreon com/thetinmen AS SAYING takes ALL LIVES E2 This iS a 'good quc Exclusive content, live steams, MATTER? hot takes, producer credits, and more nlate blindneds Do1 a beginner"s SS man guide to like this man Help support Lcan Ra chonco the prison Eyeleni IS DST @thetinmen BK WH what iS a the iS a "Dro code" TO DIE BY SUICIDE complete privilege that you live by? E? in its Dr Suete BAf Thelnien picture Own rigrt: Executive Producers (Dorothy Tier) ~Stop The gurl UGLY the Your + Cool dude + Richard D Knight + David Maywald Wh 'Get OF en Ryan WP Steve Sweeneyer + Carolina This Kinl Financtal Abuse? VIOLENCE + Marc Holmes + LHVJR + Bursi + Steven P Men; what would Men; what ung was you love to do; makes you feel rhero VuC wrong misunderstood by women? WITHOUT WORDS FOR

The most important thing in any good parent’s life, is surely their child. It matters more than anything that parent owns, or has done, or will do; with many parents laying down their own lives, without hesitation, to save that of their child. It is so important, that the moment a child is born, is the moment a parent’s life is never the same again, the moment a child is brought into the world, is a moment that is irreplaceable, and incomparable, and surely unimaginable to those like me, who are not parents. Yet, so many parents, especially fathers, have their children unfairly taken away from them; by a brutal, corrupt, secret family court system, that all-to-often operates without oversight, and outside of the best interests of children. One in five male suicides is tied to child custody battles and family break down; and if you ever meet one of these fathers, who is fighting for their child, so often in a losing battle, you will soon understand why. And yet, things are about to get even worse. The UK Government are expected to strip fathers of what little protections they have – namely the right to ‘the presumption of parental involvement’, during child custody cases. What this protection offers is that, no matter your sex, you (supposedly) enter family court under the presumption that time with both parent is what’s best for the child. Of course, this ‘presumption’ is just a starting point, from which either or both parents can argue their case in favour of themselves, or against the other, where after a lot of time, and even more money, a final decision can be made. But this is about to change. After decades of endless campaigning by feminist organisations and family law ‘experts’, the UK Government has relented, and will now remove this presumption from the Children Act. What this means, is yet to be seen. But judging by the names of those at the vanguard, who beat their chests in triumph, who promise to beckon in a new chapter of the family unit, and didn’t consult any men’s or fathers organisations in the process; it doesn’t look good. What do you think? ~ ONS data https://tinyurl.com/yn7mkayy #fathersrights

2025-10-24

Last viewed category: