@thetinmen Circumcision, has no 'medical benefits'
@thetinmen Cures paralysis Over history; circumcision has claimed many Cures epilepsy 'medical benefits' Prevents sexual violence Cures curvature of the spine 1830 1850 1870 1890 8 : Cures wet dreams Cures blindness, deafness and idiocy and over time, Stops masturbation 3 all of them Cures Cures insanity depression have been debunked: Cures bed wetting
@thetinmen Cures tuberculosis Increases fertility However; a few claims still persist. ! Prevents venereal disease and cancer of the tongue { ; { Cures cervical cancer Prevents HIV 1 ; 5 8 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 Improves 'racial hygiene Prevents UTIs Reduces syphilis and gonorrhea Enhances masculinity and sexual attractiveness Prevents penile cancer Prevents mental illness
1 'If infant circumcision reduces penile cancer we could expect to see proportionately less penile cancer in circumcising nations as compared to non-circumcising ones: No such difference is found: But these claims aren't true either .. Penile cancer rates per 100,000 USA 0.8 FINLAND 0.5 DENMARK 0.9 SWEDEN 1.1 NORWAY 1.1 Circumcising nations Non-circumcising nations Source: Edward Wallerstein, Circumcision: An American Health Fallacy
2 @thetinmen 100 circumcisions must be performed to prevent one UTI: HIV rates in 10,172 men across six African countries A study of HIV rates in 10,172 African men across six countries found that circumcised and intact men had similar levels of HIV infection. Intact 27.3% Medical Circumcision 26.2% 'The study questions Traditional 28.1% the current strategy of Circumcision large scale (circumcision) campaigns to control the HIV epidemic:' 3 Unknown 27.1%
2020 Danish Medical Association 2019 British Medical Association @thetinmen 2017 Belgian Government Committee for Bio-Ethics 2016 Doctors Opposing Circumcision 2015 Canadian Pediatric Society 2014 Swedish Medical Association 2014 Danish College of General Practitioners 2013 Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly 2013 Nordic Association of Clinical Sexologists 2013 Nordic Ombudsmen for Children and Pediatric Experts 2012 Swedish Pediatric Society 2012 German Pediatric cAnd_ now things 2010 Royal Australasian College of Physicians 2010 Royal Dutch Medical Associate are changing with 14 national medical bodies speaking out.
@thetinmen 'The parents' right to educate and freedom of religion end here, where the rights to physical integrity of an underage person and child who is incapable of giving consent are infringed_ German Pediatric Association, 2012 Bodily integrity is more important than religious faith:' Belgian Government Committee for Bio-Ethics, 2017
@thetinmen 'It robs the boys of the ability to make decisions about their own bodies:' Danish Medical Association; 2016 'There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene:' Royal Dutch Medical Association, 2010 'The decision to alter the appearance, sensitivity and functionality of the penis should be left to its owner:' Nordic Association of Clinical Sexologists; 2013 Ritual circumcision of boys was tantamount to abuse:' Danish College of General Practitioners, 2016 We consider it to be an assault on these boys:' Swedish Pediatric Society, 2012
@thetinmen With support for circumcision in the U.S also dropping steadily over the generations: 80% Poll: 'males should be routinely circumcised 70% 63% 60% 52% 50% g 43% 40% 2 330 30%: 68 20% Age 65+ Ages 45-64 Ages 30-44 Ages 18-29 10%
@thetinmen Oh_ and one more thing Y body; My choice. Boys have a right to bodily autonomy too @thetinmen
KF This isn't Young men; Why are you giving about youl up on @thetinmen Filtaan Btlteahrnun hvpocritical ula Young ovoryAsinglo houl PATH PATREON Tre cying T NT F nctosefd a VRconroat Mefet ETAi G#tf Hecdlyttenin Aeeenteitt dtoth IS THIS THE SAME patreon com/thetinmen AS SAYING takes ALL LIVES E2 This iS a 'good quc Exclusive content, live steams, MATTER? hot takes, producer credits, and more nlate blindneds Do1 a beginner"s SS man guide to like this man Help support Lcan Ra chonco the prison Eyeleni IS DST @thetinmen BK WH what iS a the iS a "Dro code" TO DIE BY SUICIDE complete privilege that you live by? E? in its Dr Suete BAf Thelnien picture Own rigrt: Executive Producers (Dorothy Tier) ~Stop The gurl UGLY the Yout + Cool dude Richard D. + David Maywald Knight Wh Get en Ryan WP Steve Sweeney IER + Carolina This Knl Financtal Abuse ? VIOLENCE + Marc Holmes +LHVJR + Bursi + Steven P Men; what would Men; what ung was you love to do; makes you feel WITHOUT rhero VuC wrong misunderstood WORDS by women? FOR

Millions of baby boys in America, and tens of millions around the world each year, in the first few days of life, have their bodily autonomy, and integrity invaded through infant male circumcision. A brutal, excruciatingly painful procedure, usually done without anesthesia, and often by a non-medically trained individual, using dirty, dangerous instruments. Not “just a snip”, that is comparable to to a haircut, or having your ears pierced, circumcision removes more than half the nerve endings of the penis, and the most sensitive part; permanently altering the appearance, and function of the penis, which can lead to life long sexual health issues. And all of it, done for no medical benefit whatsoever. Throughout history the procedure has made countless claims to the opposite; curing epilepsy, blindness, depression, bed wetting, and even ‘racial hygiene’, to wave away criticism of its barbarism, with new, equally bogus claims. None of them have been true, and over the centuries, each one has proven themselves as not only untrue, but laughable, and an insult to our intelligence as a species. Yet, some of these claims continue. Namely in reducing HIV, UTIs and penile cancer – and these “medical benefits” are no better, with widely overstated, or entirely made up claims that they reduce all three conditions. But times are slowly changing, with more than a dozen national medical organisations disavowing the procedure as having no meaningful medical advantage, and calling it what it is; “an assault”, “abuse”, and “in conflict with medical ethics.” And with that, support for circumcision is waning around America too, with the procedure finding lower numbers of approval with each generation. So when will it end? When will we listen to modern science, and protect the fundamental right to bodily integrity? What do you think?

2025-10-10

Last viewed category: