@thetinmen Women who H A ITIE men An analysis of online misandry
@thetinmen Communication Women's Studies Sociology Criminology Penology Social Science Interdisciplinary Psychology Multidisciplinary Political Science "Online misogyny' and Cultural Studies Psychology Social Computer Science Info. Systems "online misandry' research, Language Linguistics Linguistics within WebofScience databases Computer Science Al Computer Science Theory Methods Film Radio Television Information Science Library Science Philosophy Law International Relations Computer Science Interdisciplinary App: Education Educational Research Social Issues Humanities Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary Sciences Computer Science Cybernetics Hospitality Leisure Sport Tourism Psychiatry When it comes Management Psychology Clinical Ethics Telecommunications to online hate ~History Philosophy of Science Health Policy Services Health Care Sciences Services Psychology Applied Computer Science Software Engr communities, Asian Studies Engineering Electrical Electronic Music Pabchologi Biolgicgational Health the vast majority of Literature Neuroscience Medicine General Internal Medical Laboratory Technology research examines Materials Science Multidisciplinary Geography Psychology Developmental ocsacwopplied online misogyny: Social Sciences Math Methods Regional Urban Planning Public Administration Psychology Psychoanalysis ~History Ergonomics Engineering Multidisciplinary Development Studies Chemistry Multidisciplinary Anthropology Substance Abuse
@thetinmen But this new paper offers a rare insight into online misandric communities_ Uvvy nature_ comlscientificreports scientific reports Chock Ior updalos OPEN Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communities Erica Coppolillol,2a In the present online social landscape_ while misogyny is a well-established issue, misandry remains significantly underexplored: In an effort to rectify this discrepancy and better understand the phenomenon of gendered hate speech, we analyze four openly declared misogynistic and misandric Reddit communities, examining their characteristics at linguistic, emotional, and structural level: We investigate whether it is possible to devise substantial and systematic discrepancies among misogynistic and misandric groups when heterogeneous factors are taken into account: Our experimental evaluation shows that no systematic differences can be observed when double perspective, both male-to-female and female-to-male, is adopted, thus suggesting that gendered hate speech is not exacerbated by the perpetrators' gender; indeed being common factor of noxious communities and explores how hatota acichating voncent sFaccbookdLiokeeting tnd through an optimistic lens as vehicles for positive Dufcomes like: community building; Vareantalt collaboration; and online activism, extensive literature highlights their unforeseen and adverse impacts. These-include phenomena such radicalization echo chambers? , they compare to Ineqyaity tbifensise generally targets nntnolalaies according to features such as ethnicity; tation, class gender In particulat gendered hate speech refers online misogynistic communities.
@thetinmen 'We are interested in assessing if and at which extent misogynistic communities differ from misandric ones, either in terms of linguistic, emotional or structural features: 8&$ Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist (_ )
@thetinmen Considered misandric r/GenderCritical r /Feminism The study used several custom trained Als, to analyse discussion across #% four Reddit communities. r/Incels Ki= 'MensRights Considered misogynistic
@thetinmen 1. Linguistic Features (evaluating the most common words) r/Feminism r/MensRights r/GenderCritical r/Incels The majority of all content was estimated as non-toxic. With a smaller; less prominent peak of high toxicity from r/MensRights and especially r/incels: 3 Non-toxic Most toxic
@thetinmen II. Emotional Features (evaluating the most common emotions) Anger On a text based level, the greatest peaks for all communities were in hate and anger; with incels 2 ; peaking within sadness 'No significant differences' were found between communities: Sadness Anger However at a user-level distributions change, 'drastically magnifying the hate peak of 2 Feminism, with more 'negative sentiment' seen in misandric communities: 3 Sadness
@thetinmen III. Structural Features (evaluating interactions and structure) r/Feminism was similar to . T/MensRights Large, loosely connected communities with many small clusters: r/lncels was similar to. /GenderCritical Denser, more tightly connected network structures:
Study conclusion: The performed analyses reveal that no systematic differences can be devised across the misogynistic and misandric communities. This suggests that, in addressing the phenomenon of online gendered hate speech, both male-to-female and female-to-male perspectives should be taken into account, thus recognizing equal importance to both misandry and misogyny: 'It is crucial to recognize that hate speech harms individuals regardless of gender; and therefore, interventions aimed at mitigating such behavior should be gender-neutral:'
@thetinmen Research conducted into "online misogyny" and "online misandry" over time. 101 100 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Is it time we talked about online misandry? What do you think? thetinmen
T This isn't Young men; why are you giving about youl up an @thetinmen FtnOCn Btltealtnan hypocritical alc Young ovoryasinglo houf PATH PATREON ale Gying T NT = Anand 3 IS THIS THE SAME t ctt Heiteetoninrcnehi patreon com/thetinmen AS SAYING takes ALL LIVES E2 This I8 a 'good que Exclusive content, live steams, MATTER? hot takes, producer credits, and more. entate Leu Doye a beginner's SS man like this man Help support AC ctonko the prson Gylenn @thetinmen IST SK WHY MEN MMen; what iS a the equality; iS a "bro code" TO DIE BY SUICIDE complete privilege that you live by? EE? in its Dr Su9t Banrett Executive Producers (Dorothy Tier) ~Stop; + Cool dude El + Steve Sweeney + Conal McFadyen Te Nour gurt eng_ +Ryan W + LHVJR UTH + Caractacus Potts Wh OF + Marc Holmes + Steven PTNER + Neal R. .Verma This Finince AbuSO? Bursi David Maywald ICE Richard D. Knight + Carolina Men; what would Men; what ung Was you love to do; makes you feel WITHOUT rhero WuC; wrong misunderstood WORDS by women? FOR

When it comes to online hate communities, it is of little surprise that the vast majority of research and awareness focuses on ‘online misogyny’. The Manosphere, The Red Pill, Andrew Tate, Digital Misogyny, are all newly fangled terms that now pepper the lexicon of society. Today, ‘Online Harms’, according to OfCom, is being re-evaluated to focus on ‘women and girls’, with the very laws around hate speech similarly being rewritten to criminalize ‘misogyny’ as a hate crime. I don’t deny such changes can be useful, and are needed; I see plenty of awful things said about women online, but so too I see and experience awful things said about men. Terrible things are said about mens mental health, and about male loneliness; even men who quietly attempt to end their lives are cruelly targeted, with disgraceful talk of “let’s get those numbers higher!” The only difference seems to be that online misogyny is largely condemned by society, whilst online misandry is scoffed and sneered at, to be widely minimized, or denied altogether. But I ronically, nothing is more misandric, than denying its very existence. So, it is refreshing to see a new paper, published in the world’s most respected scientific journal, that not only examines online misandry, but compares it to online misogyny across various linguistic, emotional and structural levels. And the results may well surprise you… What do you think? ~ Full study here https://tinyurl.com/2s4jwn3b

2025-12-17

Last viewed category: