I recently shared a post about intimate partner violence, based on data from the infamous, and enormous 2007 Whittaker study on 18,760 (!) relationships, that found: 50% of intimate partner violence was bilateral (with both partners doing it), 35% was female to male violence, and 15% was male to female. This makes “male violence”, which dominates advocacy and our airwaves, the least common form of IPV. These are certainly controversial findings, but I must admit, the data is rather old now. Luckily, one of my many talented followers, who is a family violence researcher, has replicated the study, this time with new data, from various countries, and samples around the world. I wanted to share the data; and how, yes, it’s more-or-less the same again. Most shocking to me, was the biggest disparity in unilateral violence was seen in middle/high school samples, where girls were 2.5 TIMES (!) more likely to be unilaterally violent than boys. This surely shines new light on why BOTH girls and boys should be taught about the dangers of IPV, and BOTH girls and boys should be protected from it. So, will this study, and its additional tens of thousands of surveyed participants, spanning several countries, do anything to change the warped, ideological narrative of IPV, that causes so much harm? What do you think? ~ Source https://tinyurl.com/yh9erb23
2025-11-05


![Middler /highschc TABLAIA Kelohanauanet Clarecterstics 64 Antices lncluded Reviely Characterise Shnple5ee Utlieucnet Ha#a Geported nelea 1,573 Senple qype Lirge populetion stues Keeatattileenlt ne Now have new data_ Hollelu Fune @thetinmen Hanneeeennenaldaunonaan =enann AnudElhf Suae Elualerence H Leacenete 'Clinical samples n Ketn AleIea (ousn n]] Ftlan Patter 46132 Volume Number 2023 Bidirectional and Unidirectional Intimate Partner Violence: A Comprehensive Review Alexandra Lysova, PhD Kenzie Hanson, MA Simon Fraser University; Burnaby; BC, Canada Jennifer Mackay; PhD Nottingham Trent University; Nottingham, UK he debate over whether intimate partner violence (IPV) primarily unidirectional by Tnem (male-perpetrated violence against women) or bidir- ectional (both partners engaging violence) remains significant: 2012 systematic reviewv determined the prevalence of bidirectional and unidirec- tional IPV various population samples (Langhinrichsen-Rohling et al 2012)- The current comprehensive review updates the 2012 review, ana lyzing 64 empirical studies directly related to the bidirectionality of physi cal violence between 2012 University/college students n-2,592 unidirectional violence by DmmaIi communin_ univeraby college students addlescent middlehigh echool etdentes Faaa ennanee mentment eelungl andeothher atudy chanactenshicg: mldhtatthestdiret [nieaare nleaeuenenlt Lneeoentile tent[lne Small communi This study breaks down even more partner violence alge data,ton= 3 across various areas and countries, to see if these findings change _](https://thetinmen.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/17874831645355479.jpg)







